5 Things You Need to Know About FCT

Children with autism experience deficits across a wide variety of skill areas that include social communication. In addition, many children with autism also have comorbid diagnoses that include other types of communication challenges such as apraxia. As a result, these children tend to engage in higher rates of challenging behavior than their peers. This makes the use of Functional Communication Training (FCT) one of the most widely applicable interventions available in the field of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).

Due to deficits in effective communication, children with autism often rely on challenging behavior as a form of communication to get their needs met. An extensive body of research supports the use of Functional Communication Training (FCT) across a wide demographic of children, settings and behaviors. Here we look at 5 key facts from the research that you need to know before you get started.

In order to effectively implement FCT, you must understand each of the steps involved. For a detailed description of the implementation process, read the post: Reduce Challenging Behavior by Teaching Functional Communication on Accessible ABA.

1. Functional Communication Training can be used with children who don’t communicate vocally

Pat Mirenda (2003) reviewed existing research to evaluate the use of different types of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in teaching functional communication to children who don’t use speech functionally. Many children with autism lack sufficient vocal verbal ability to clearly communicate what they want. For many of these children, challenging behavior becomes a primary means of communication.

Children who don’t communicate with speech learn to get what they want through a variety of means, often including challenging behavior. Teaching these children to use AAC (sign language, PECS, or Speech Generating Device) to communicate these wants and needs leads to a reduction in undesirable behavior as they develop a more extensive repertoire of mands.

Children who use AAC to communicate can be taught to mand for those things they want as we would do with their vocal verbal peers. You can create programs for teaching children to use AAC to request desired items, activities or attention or to escape from those tasks they don’t want to participate in.

Even if your learner uses AAC, incorporate FCT in your programming if this would otherwise be an appropriate intervention.

2. FCT can reduce challenging behavior maintained by multiple variables

One of the keys to effective intervention in ABA is teaching functionally equivalent replacement behavior when trying to reduce or eliminate challenging behavior. Often functional communication serves as one of the best replacement behaviors, whether the behavior is maintained by access or escape.

Prior to implementing FCT, you must conduct a functional behavior assessment (FBA) or functional analysis (FA) to identify the function of the challenging behavior. If you’re not sure which is best for your specific situation, read the article: What is the Difference Between Functional Analysis and Functional Behavior Assessment? on Accessible ABA. Often, the assessment identifies multiple different variables that support the challenging behavior.

For example, aggression might be initially triggered by the demand to engage in a difficult task during a period of low attention with a consistent response of an adult nagging or negotiating compliance. In this situation, it’s likely that the aggression is maintained both by adult attention and escape from the task demand. When you use FCT to teach the child to first request the adult’s attention and then ask for a break, then you teach replacement for both of the identified functions of behavior.

Accurately identifying the function of the challenging behavior leads to successfully determining which communicative response best serves as a replacement behavior. Carr and Durand (1985) conducted a study that evaluated the effectiveness of FCT on behaviors that were controlled by access to adult attention and escape from difficult tasks. Teaching communicative responses that serve the same function (i.e. access or escape) often leads to meaningful decreases in challenging behavior.

3. Functional Communication Training can be implemented by parents and teachers

Mancil and Boman (2010) looked at generalizing functional communication that was initially taught in a clinical setting to a more natural setting such as the home or school. The authors identified 10 support components that improved the maintenance and generality of functional communication training:

  1. Data collection procedures
  2. Seizing the environment
  3. Planning for generalization
  4. Prompting
  5. Reinforcing
  6. Extinction
  7. Shaping
  8. Fading
  9. Delay
  10. Following data

Although all of these 10 components belong in most ABA treatment packages, it’s helpful to specifically relate them to FCT when considering having professionals or parents outside the field implement the intervention. Training must include all of these components for successful implementation.

Due to the relative simplicity and effectiveness of FCT, parents and teachers often find this intervention highly acceptable and willingly implement it. With minimal training, parents and teachers often implement the intervention with high fidelity.

4. FCT can be included in a comprehensive treatment package to reduce high intensity behavior

In the article: How Do I Use Social Stories to Teach Replacement Behaviors? on Accessible ABA we discuss the use of a Hard Times Board to teach functional communication as a replacement for challenging behavior. In the example below, the social story includes a functional way for the child to use language to escape from an aversive stimuli (a loud noise). The social story identifies the triggers, things the child can’t do and then what the child can say to get away from the noise.

preschool elementary hard times board
preschool elementary hard times board

Gerhardt, Weiss, and Delmonlino (2004) used a treatment package that included functional communication training and noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) to reduce severe aggression from an 18 year old man with autism. NCR is the delivery of the identified reinforcer for a challenging behavior independent of a specific response. Here’s an example:

You conduct an FBA to determine the variables maintaining your client’s aggression. Based on data analysis, you hypothesize that the behavior is maintained by access to a tangible, specifically the iPad. You determine that NCR is the best intervention to reduce this behavior and establish an initial reinforcement interval of 10 minutes based on baseline data. You train parents to provide your client with the iPad every 10 minutes, regardless of what your client is doing during that interval.

During NCR, there is no requirement that the child perform any specific response or behavior to earn reinforcement. NCR can be an effective intervention when included as part of a complete treatment package that teaches an adaptive alternative behavior. FCT teaches the child how to request that item (or attention or escape, etc.) and NCR reduces the motivating operations (MO) for that reinforcer. Used together, FCT and NCR form a powerful treatment package for high intensity behavior.

5. Children can learn to identify “signals” for when reinforcement is available

One concern with functional communication training is the relatively high rates of reinforcement requested by children. Initially, when using FCT, interventionists must reinforce each request made by the child to reinforce the communicative response. This can lead to rates of reinforcement that are impractical in the natural environment (i.e. home or school). To address this concern, Kuhn, Chirighin, and Zelenka (2010) taught 2 children to discriminate between times when adults engaged in busy and non busy activities. The children’s communicative responses were reinforced during the non busy activities and they were taught to wait during the busy activities.

This study opens the door to other means of signaling to the children the need to wait for a period of time before reinforcement is available again. The authors in the study used natural cues to signal availability of reinforcement , although similar studies have also looked at more contrived stimuli (i.e. signal cards). Although consistent reinforcement is critical to the success of FCT, for the intervention to be practical in the natural environment, teaching delay to reinforcement is a critical step in the process.

Parents, teachers or direct care staff can signal when reinforcement is available through a variety of means such as a bracelet, card or activity. Although it takes a little time and effort to teach this delay to reinforcement, it’s well worth it in the long run.

Now that you know more about functional communication training, go out and give it a try!

References and Further Reading

Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of applied behavior analysis18(2), 111-126.

Gerhardt, P. F., Weiss, M. J., & Delmolino, L. (2004). Treatment of severe aggression in an adolescent with autism: Non-contingent Reinforcement and Functional Communication Training. The Behavior Analyst Today4(4), 386.

Kuhn, D. E., Chirighin, A. E., & Zelenka, K. (2010). Discriminated functional communication: A procedural extension of functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis43(2), 249-264.

Kurtz, P. F., Boelter, E. W., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Chin, M. D., & Hagopian, L. P. (2011). An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities32(6), 2935-2942.

Mancil, G. R. (2006). Functional communication training: A review of the literature related to children with autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities41(3), 213.

Mancil, G. R., & Boman, M. (2010). Functional communication training in the classroom: A guide for success. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth54(4), 238-246.

Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

Volkert, V. M., Lerman, D. C., Call, N. A., & Trosclair‐Lasserre, N. (2009). An evaluation of resurgence during treatment with functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis42(1), 145-160.